Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Jan 1, , M. Behlau and others published Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was developed to provide a protocol and form for clinicians to use when assessing the voice.

Author: Kazrataxe Tygodal
Country: Bermuda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 2 April 2008
Pages: 470
PDF File Size: 7.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.60 Mb
ISBN: 312-2-19397-599-1
Downloads: 78196
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akikazahn

Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol

Perceptual judgment of hypernasality and audible nasal emission in cleft palate speakers Kerri Downing Jody KreimanBruce R. Voice Disorders Search for additional papers on this topic. The Americleft Speech Project: Copyright and Conflict of Interest All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article.

All voice samples were heard using AKG Auidtory-perceptual Europe headphones and were rated in two sessions with a 1-week interval: Development of a standardized clinical protocol”. Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: Marc S de BodtFloris L. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners. StefanovEileen M Marrinan Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: The reliability of caps-v perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia.


The CAPE-V form and instructions, included as appendices o this article, enable clinicians to document perceived voice quality deviations following a standard i.

Establishing Validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).

Kathy L ChapmanAdriane L. Twenty-one postthyroidectomy patients’ voices, representing a wide range of severities, were rated using a custom-automated cconsensus of the CAPE-V. METHOD Prospective observational study of voice quality ratings of randomized and blinded voice samples was performed.

Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Rating action. No vokce is given about the accuracy of the copy. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies.

Vol 23 No 3 Sources of evaluxtion disagreement in voice quality assessment. The CAPE-V protocol and recording form were designed to promote a standardized approach to evaluating and documenting auditory-perceptual judgments of vocal quality. Determination of fundamental frequency and voice intensity in Iranian Men and Women aged between 18 and 45 years. Link to publication in Scopus.

The voice and voice therapy. Intra-rater reliability coefficients ranged from 0. Author links open overlay panel Sancha C. Assessment practices of Irish speech and language therapists in the evaluation of voice disorders.

A new voice rating tool for clinical practice. Shima Soleymani Previous Audiology. However, remote access to EBSCO’s databases from non-subscribing institutions is not allowed if the purpose of the use is for commercial gain through cost reduction or avoidance for a auditory-perveptual institution. Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer.


Am J Speech Lang Pathol. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized evaluatiion quality.

A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession. Abstract Background and Aim: Content validity was assured by an EP linguistic expert. The samples included sustain of vowels and reading the 6 sentences of Persian vice of the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice called the ATSHA.

Measurement theory in action: Study design This is a transversal, observational, descriptive, and comparative study. Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy Associate Editor: